12-24-2007, 06:17 AM
Not really a criticism, but why not post more information?
For example, when someone simply posts: Pink Floyd - Have A Cigar, I`m tempted to say..."well so what?...you want a medal or something?"
To be fair, a lot of people do post a line or two extra..ie "great solo on this one", or "I really like this song because..."; but a hell of a lot of people don`t. Why not? The idea, surely, is to promote discussion.
It`s even stranger on the movie and book threads. How can one watch a whole movie, or get half-way through a book (even more bizarre) without even a one-line comment?
If PFO`ers want to take the time to publicise what they`re listening to/watching/reading, then why not at least say whether they think it`s any good or not? (it doesn`t have to be an in-depth critique).
Just an observation. Any connection with the subject of shallow "post-count boosting" is entirely coincidental.
For example, when someone simply posts: Pink Floyd - Have A Cigar, I`m tempted to say..."well so what?...you want a medal or something?"

To be fair, a lot of people do post a line or two extra..ie "great solo on this one", or "I really like this song because..."; but a hell of a lot of people don`t. Why not? The idea, surely, is to promote discussion.
It`s even stranger on the movie and book threads. How can one watch a whole movie, or get half-way through a book (even more bizarre) without even a one-line comment?
If PFO`ers want to take the time to publicise what they`re listening to/watching/reading, then why not at least say whether they think it`s any good or not? (it doesn`t have to be an in-depth critique).
Just an observation. Any connection with the subject of shallow "post-count boosting" is entirely coincidental.
