(12-11-2010 12:38 PM)silverpot Wrote:  I'm not sure I follow your train of thoughts properly, my point was that the sound and melodic properties of their music are more of a Gilmour thing and the concepts are all Waters' . I agree that Roger needed David more than David needed Roger, regarding the musical content.

I was never in disagreement with you on that. You said in the post before mine, that you were talking more about their solo efforts than music they made while in Pink Floyd, and I said that even in taking that into account, Roger's work needed David's input more than David's work needed Roger's input. Which then correlates to their work while in the band, and that after Roger left and went solo, David and Co. were still able to make solid albums that sold and toured well, even without Roger's lyrical and conceptual work.